All published actions (75)
Sorted newest first by publication/decision date. Each entry links to the
regulator's own capture. Ongoing proceedings are explicitly labelled as not
a decided outcome.
AUSTRAC · 2026-07-03 ·
enforceable undertaking · amount not stated ·
undertaking in force
Executed 3 Jul 2026; listed as ongoing on the AUSTRAC register as of this capture.
Enforceable undertaking, ongoing. Diarised milestones: midway report 31 December 2026, final auditor report 30 July 2027.
Source: CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Verify at source.
Source documents (2)
NT Wagering Commission · 2026-06-29 ·
penalty · $38,556 (Two separate fines in one decision: $27,540 (170 penalty units, 100% of max - failing to detect and act on red-flag behaviour) plus $11,016 (68 penalty units, 40% of max - continuing to send marketing after an unsubscribe request).) ·
finalised
Fined twice in the one decision, decided by the successor Northern Territory Wagering Commission: for failing to monitor a customer's red-flag deposit activity, and for continuing to market to him after he asked to be unsubscribed.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
ACMA · 2026-05-06 ·
enforceable undertaking · amount not stated ·
undertaking in force
Published 6 May 2026.
Court-enforceable undertaking after ACMA found more than 500 breaches of national self-exclusion (BetStop) rules across the Ladbrokes AU and Neds AU wagering brands, including accounts that stayed open more than a year after self-exclusion.
Source: CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Verify at source.
Source documents (4)
ACMA · 2026-02-12 ·
infringement · $158,400 ·
finalised
Published 12 Feb 2026; investigation finalised 22 Sep 2025.
8 infringement notices totalling $158,400 for accepting 426 illegal in-play bets across 32 tennis matches between February 2024 and June 2025 - the third in-play breach ACMA has recorded against Tabcorp since 2021.
Source: CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Verify at source.
Source documents (11)
- https://www.acma.gov.au/articles/2026-02/tabcorp-pays-158400-penalty-taking-illegal-play-sports-bets (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
f32c27badbc8...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/publications/2026-02/report/investigation-report-infringement-notices-and-enforceable-undertaking-tabcorp-holdings-limited (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
c4f7201f74e2...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Investigation%20Report%20-%20Tabcorp%20Holdings%20Limited.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
d8b61568a91d...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Infringement%20Notice%200001%20-%20Tabcorp%20Holdings%20Limited_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
db7e03dd0cc1...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Infringement%20Notice%200002%20-%20Tabcorp%20Holdings%20Limited_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
f3630f5ea516...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Infringement%20Notice%200003%20-%20Tabcorp%20Holdings%20Limited_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
cd190fedb806...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Infringement%20Notice%200004%20-%20Tabcorp%20Holdings%20Limited_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
66d2a69a52bb...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Infringement%20Notice%200005%20-%20Tabcorp%20Holdings%20Limited_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
5bec50e32734...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Infringement%20Notice%200006%20-%20Tabcorp%20Holdings%20Limited_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
55fdd310b478...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Infringement%20Notice%200007%20-%20Tabcorp%20Holdings%20Limited_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
3bd09066f565...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/Infringement%20Notice%200008%20-%20Tabcorp%20Holdings%20Limited_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
d9705f158b44...)
NT Wagering Commission · 2025-11-12 ·
penalty · $313,140 (18 separate contraventions (102 penalty units each, 60% of the maximum available at the time of each contravention), spanning the 2022/23 and 2023/24 financial years - the barbecue-sentence-test fixture: $313,140 for failing to send activity statements to a large number of customers over 18 months.) ·
finalised
Fined for 18 separate months (Nov 2022 - Apr 2024) of failing to issue mandatory activity statements to a large number of customers.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
ACMA · 2025-09-18 ·
enforceable undertaking · amount not stated ·
undertaking in force
Accepted 18 Sep 2025; varied afterwards (implementation-plan deadline extended from 20 to 50 business days).
Court-enforceable undertaking addressing Tabcorp's in-play betting compliance systems, referenced by ACMA alongside both the 2023 and 2024/25 in-play infringement notice batches.
Source: CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Verify at source.
Source documents (4)
NT Wagering Commission · 2025-09-09 ·
penalty · $13,430 (85 penalty units (50% of max) - matter distinct from the 11 Dec 2023 Bet Right decision above (different complainant and conduct).) ·
finalised
Fine for a licence-condition breach identified in resolving a customer dispute.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2025-07-24 ·
penalty · $26,690 (170 penalty units (100% of max).) ·
finalised
Maximum fine for a licence-condition breach identified in resolving a customer dispute.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2025-07-22 ·
penalty · $14,960 (85 penalty units (50% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine for a licence-condition breach identified in resolving a customer dispute.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2025-06-30 ·
penalty · $27,540 (170 penalty units (100% of max).) ·
finalised
Maximum fine for breaching Code of Practice clause 8.6, identified in resolving a customer dispute.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2025-06-19 ·
penalty · $92,500 (500 penalty units, 50% of the maximum 1,000 available - the project's golden fixture for the current (2024) Racing and Wagering Act regime.) ·
finalised
Fined after sending SMS marketing to 30 self-excluded customers and 124 customers on a short- or long-term break, in breach of the Code of Practice.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2025-05-23 ·
penalty · $17,952 (102 penalty units (60% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine for a licence-condition breach identified in resolving a customer dispute.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
ACMA · 2025-05-21 ·
infringement · $1,014,120 (ACMA's media release states the total penalty paid is $1,014,120 across the notice series. This capture holds 4 individual notices from that series (each $18,780, numbers NSER-BETCHOICE-0001/0015/0029/0043) as evidence samples, not the complete notice set.) ·
finalised
Published 21 May 2025.
Infringement notices totalling $1,014,120 for over 100,000 contraventions - failing to close the BetStop-registered accounts of 954 customers, some for 190+ days, and letting 45 of those customers keep betting on old accounts.
Source: CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Verify at source.
Source documents (7)
ACMA · 2025-05-16 ·
enforceable undertaking · $500,800 (ACMA's media release states PointsBet 'has paid a $500,800 spam penalty and is subject to enforceable undertakings'. This capture holds the enforceable undertaking PDF and the investigation report; a separate infringement-notice document specific to the $500,800 figure was not independently isolated - verify at source.) ·
undertaking in force
Published 16 May 2025.
$500,800 penalty and enforceable undertaking after PointsBet breached spam law (705 unsubscribe-free emails, 7 unconsented marketing emails, 90 commercial texts without sender details) and BetStop self-exclusion rules (508 marketing messages sent to self-excluded customers).
Source: CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Verify at source.
Source documents (4)
ACMA · 2025-04-16 ·
enforceable undertaking · amount not stated ·
undertaking in force
Signed 16 Apr 2025.
Enforceable undertaking accompanying the BetStop self-exclusion infringement notices above.
Source: CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Verify at source.
Source documents (2)
NT Wagering Commission · 2025-04-09 ·
penalty · $13,430 (85 penalty units (50% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine for not having an adequate customer interaction after a customer repeatedly closed and reopened his betting account within short periods, a pattern the Code treats as a possible sign of harm.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2025-03-12 ·
penalty · $13,345 (85 penalty units (50% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine for a licence-condition breach identified in resolving a customer dispute.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2025-02-24 ·
penalty · $17,952 (102 penalty units (60% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine for a licence-condition breach identified in resolving a customer dispute.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
AUSTRAC · 2024-12-16 ·
civil proceedings · amount not stated ·
ONGOING - not a decided outcome
Originating application filed 16 Dec 2024 (NSD1814/2024).
AUSTRAC civil penalty proceedings against Entain Group Pty Ltd (trading as Ladbrokes, Neds and other brands) for alleged serious and systemic non-compliance with AML/CTF law. Trial is listed for 30 November 2026 - the status will not change before judgment.
This is ONGOING and is NOT a decided outcome. Proceedings have a status and a next date, not a result. The status shown here will not change before a judgment or final decision is published.
Source: CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Verify at source.
Source documents (6)
ACMA · 2024-11-13 ·
infringement · $262,920 ·
finalised
Published 13 Nov 2024. The 14 infringement notices were issued 30 Sep - 24 Oct 2023 for conduct between April and October 2023.
14 infringement notices totalling $262,920 for accepting 854 illegal in-play bets across 69 sporting events between April and October 2023 (a system fault, per ACMA, not fixed for about 6 months).
Source: CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Verify at source.
Source documents (17)
- https://www.acma.gov.au/articles/2024-11/tabcorp-pays-262000-penalty-illegal-play-bets (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
5341cb3c5d40...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/publications/2024-11/report/investigation-report-and-infringement-notices-tabcorp-holdings-limited (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
6b9aa28104fb...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-02/Final%20Investigation%20report%20-%20Tabcorp%20Holdings%20Limited.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
43ef9275382e...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-11/0001%20-%20Infringement%20Notice%20Tabcorp%2030%20September%202023_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
d4eea0fbb52d...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-11/0002%20-%20Infringement%20Notice%20Tabcorp%2002%20October%202023_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
72ccbe470b69...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-11/0003%20-%20Infringement%20Notice%20Tabcorp%2003%20October%202023_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
d0b42f5bdbed...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-11/0004%20-%20Infringement%20Notice%20Tabcorp%2007%20October%202023_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
20379da4d0ab...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-11/0005%20-%20Infringement%20Notice%20Tabcorp%2008%20October%202023_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
7ec4fdf66b36...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-11/0006%20-%20Infringement%20Notice%20Tabcorp%2010%20October%202023_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
2db8371836c2...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-11/0007%20-%20Infringement%20Notice%20Tabcorp%2011%20October%202023_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
c53167659b45...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-11/0008%20-%20Infringement%20Notice%20Tabcorp%2012%20October%202023_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
36c266c6547b...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-11/0009%20-%20Infringement%20Notice%20Tabcorp%2014%20October%202023_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
cc5bce5eef1d...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-11/0010%20-%20Infringement%20Notice%20Tabcorp%2015%20October%202023_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
7df2781bd486...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-11/0011%20-%20Infringement%20Notice%20Tabcorp%2016%20October%202023_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
c1e9a0ce8e49...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-11/0012%20-%20Infringement%20Notice%20Tabcorp%2018%20October%202023_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
0775717a15e7...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-11/0013%20-%20Infringement%20Notice%20Tabcorp%2023%20October%202023_Redacted.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
902953550e80...) - https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-11/0014%20-%20Infringement%20Notice%20Tabcorp%2024%20October%202023_Redacted_0.pdf (captured 2026-07-18T06:27:22Z, sha256
8c9e06fb829e...)
NT Wagering Commission · 2024-10-24 ·
penalty · $5,508 (34 penalty units (20% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine for not having sufficient responsible-gambling procedures to detect and assist a customer in a timely manner.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
VGCCC · 2024-08-22 ·
penalty · $4,600,000 ·
finalised
Notice to show cause 18 Jun 2024; decision 22 Aug 2024.
$4,600,000 fine for breaching the Harm Minimisation Direction and the Responsible Gambling Code of Conduct in dealings with a customer.
Source: CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
VGCCC · 2024-08-14 ·
formal warning · amount not stated ·
finalised
Date of decision.
Letter of censure for 153 occasions of direct marketing sent to customers who had elected to 'Take a Break'.
Source: CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
VGCCC · 2024-08-06 ·
formal warning · amount not stated ·
finalised
Date of decision.
Letter of censure for 985 unapproved firewall rules that operated without Commission approval, 2015-2024.
Source: CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
VGCCC · 2024-08-06 ·
formal warning · amount not stated ·
finalised
Date of decision.
Letter of censure for 4,169 SMS marketing messages sent on 28 July 2023 without the mandatory opt-out link.
Source: CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2024-06-24 ·
penalty · $24,174 (153 penalty units (90% of max) - Commission-initiated investigation into dealings with one gambler (Mr A); a separate same-day decision covers a different gambler (Mr E).) ·
finalised
Fine from a Commission-initiated investigation into Betfair's dealings with a gambler, for failing to identify and act on red-flag behaviour.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2024-06-24 ·
penalty · $24,174 (153 penalty units (90% of max) - Commission-initiated investigation into dealings with one gambler (Mr E); a separate same-day decision covers a different gambler (Mr A).) ·
finalised
Fine from a Commission-initiated investigation into Betfair's dealings with a gambler, for failing to identify and act on red-flag behaviour.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
AUSTRAC · 2024-05-30 ·
enforceable undertaking · amount not stated ·
finalised
Signed 30 May 2024; listed as concluded on the AUSTRAC register as of this capture (closed 3 Jul 2026 per the project's maintenance compact).
Enforceable undertaking and remedial action plan; AUSTRAC's register lists it under concluded (not ongoing) enforceable undertakings.
Source: CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Verify at source.
Source documents (2)
NT Wagering Commission · 2024-04-24 ·
penalty · $82,620 (Three separate maximum fines of $27,540 each (170 penalty units, 100% of max): urging a non-customer to wager with an inducement, offering that inducement, and failing to have an appropriate customer interaction.) ·
finalised
Fined for three separate breaches in one decision: urging a non-customer to open an account with a deposit-match inducement, and failing to identify red-flag wagering behaviour.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2024-04-24 ·
penalty · $79,390 (Commission-initiated investigation into dealings with one gambler; three separate maximum-or-near-maximum fines: $26,350 (urging to buy), $26,350 (red-flag behaviour, 2016 Code) and $26,690 (red-flag behaviour, 2016/2019 Code), each 170 penalty units at the era's per-unit value.) ·
finalised
Fined for three separate breaches identified in a Commission-initiated investigation into BetEasy's dealings with a gambler: urging continued wagering and two distinct failures to act on red-flag behaviour.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2024-04-03 ·
penalty · $22,032 (136 penalty units (80% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine for not acting on a customer's spoken admission that he was a 'gambling addict', instead offering him a bonus-bet and deposit-match inducement.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2024-03-08 ·
penalty · $21,488 (136 penalty units (80% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine for a licence-condition breach identified in resolving a customer dispute.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2024-02-29 ·
penalty · $21,352 (136 penalty units (80% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine for a licence-condition breach identified in resolving a customer dispute.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2023-12-11 ·
penalty · $6,751 (43 penalty units (25% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine for not properly monitoring red-flag behaviour after a customer's cancelled-withdrawal function was re-enabled at his request.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
VGCCC · 2023-11-23 ·
formal warning · amount not stated ·
finalised
Date of decision.
Letter of censure for two instances of unapproved software changes to the Wagering and Betting System (Jul-Sep 2022); also directed to engage an independent expert on software-deployment controls.
Source: CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2023-11-03 ·
penalty · $20,096 (75% of the maximum penalty then available - matter concerns the TopBetta brand, operated under PlayUp's licence since TopBetta's 2019 decommissioning.) ·
finalised
Fine for not monitoring and acting on red-flag wagering behaviour (cancelled withdrawals, increasing bet size, long sessions).
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
VGCCC · 2023-09-04 ·
penalty · $1,000,000 ·
finalised
Date of decision and reasons (hearing 28 Jul 2023).
$1,000,000 fine for contravening two directions relating to the 7 November 2020 Wagering and Betting System outage.
Source: CC BY 4.0 with attribution. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2023-07-20 ·
penalty · $26,860 (170 penalty units (100% of max) - the highest available at the time.) ·
finalised
Maximum fine for deficiencies in PlayUp's self-exclusion data-matching system that put a vulnerable customer at risk.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2023-06-30 ·
penalty · $31,620 (Four separate fines in one decision (Neds.com.au Pty Ltd's conduct, liability assumed by acquirer Entain Group Pty Ltd): $2,635 (unrecorded call), $7,905 x2 (deposit-activity monitoring failures) and $7,905 (Gambling Incident Register failure).) ·
finalised
Fined for four separate breaches in one decision concerning a re-opened betting account: an unrecorded phone call, two failures to act on large/escalating deposit activity, and a record-keeping failure.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2023-06-30 ·
penalty · $13,345 (50% of the then-maximum penalty.) ·
finalised
Fine for not acting quickly enough on an internal red-flag report generated by its own monitoring system.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2023-04-20 ·
penalty · $82,620 (Three separate maximum fines of $27,540 each (170 penalty units, 100% of max), one per contact date (16 Dec 2022, 23 Dec 2022, 6 Jan 2023) - matter distinct from the 24 Apr 2024 BaggyBet decision above.) ·
finalised
Fined for sending SMS messages to self-excluded persons on three separate occasions.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2023-04-12 ·
penalty · $13,345 (85 penalty units (50% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine for a licence-condition breach identified in resolving a customer dispute.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2023-03-09 ·
penalty · $22,137 (Commission-initiated investigation into dealings with one gambler; two separate fines: $13,345 (85 penalty units, 50% of max - Code breach) plus $8,792 (56 penalty units, 30% of max - failure to record calls on two occasions).) ·
finalised
Fined twice in a Commission-initiated investigation into PointsBet's dealings with a gambler: for a Code of Practice breach and for failing to record required calls.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2023-02-27 ·
penalty · $78,540 (Commission-initiated investigation into dealings with one gambler; three separate maximum fines of $26,180 each (170 penalty units, 100% of max): urging the gambler to keep wagering, and two separate red-flag (losses-at-account-opening; large deposits/losses over the account's life) monitoring failures.) ·
finalised
Fined for three separate breaches identified in a Commission-initiated investigation into Ladbrokes' dealings with a gambler: urging continued wagering and two distinct failures to act on red-flag behaviour.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2023-02-24 ·
penalty · $31,416 (Two separate fines in one decision: $18,326 (70% of the 2017-value maximum - breach of terms and conditions) plus $13,090 (50% of max - urging the complainant to use its gambling services).) ·
finalised
Fined twice in the one decision, for breaching its own terms and conditions in dealings with a customer and for urging that customer to keep wagering.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2023-02-20 ·
penalty · $13,770 (85 penalty units (50% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine after a customer-verification list mix-up meant self-excluded persons were sent an email intended for unverified customers.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2023-02-09 ·
penalty · $55,080 (Two maximum fines totalled by the Commission itself: 170 penalty units for breach of Code clause 8.6 and a further 170 penalty units for breach of clause 8.9(a), 340 penalty units in total.) ·
finalised
Fined for two separate Code of Practice breaches in one decision (matter distinct from the 25 Nov 2022 betr decision above).
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2022-12-15 ·
penalty · $13,770 (85 penalty units (50% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine after a promotional email was sent to thousands of recipients including hundreds of self-excluded persons, in breach of the Code of Practice.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2022-12-07 ·
penalty · $27,540 (170 penalty units (100% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine, self-reported in part by the operator, for allowing four self-excluded customers to open and use betting accounts due to a manual self-exclusion handling error.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2022-11-25 ·
penalty · $20,655 (127.5 penalty units (75% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine after betr affiliates contacted a self-excluded person to invite him to open an account, shortly before the platform's public launch.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2022-05-20 ·
penalty · $8,007 (51 penalty units (30% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine for deficiencies in PlayUp's self-exclusion data-matching system.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2022-04-20 ·
penalty · $13,345 (85 penalty units (50% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine for contacting self-excluded persons, in breach of the Code of Practice.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2022-03-17 ·
penalty · $13,345 (85 penalty units (50% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine for a licence-condition breach relating to responsible gambling monitoring.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2021-11-25 ·
penalty · $26,690 (170 penalty units (100% of max) - a repeat breach; a prior, separate breach of the same clause had already drawn the same maximum fine.) ·
finalised
Fine after a Commission member witnessed Neds business development staff offering unauthorised sign-up bonuses to non-customers at a racecourse event.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2021-10-18 ·
penalty · $53,720 (Two separate maximum fines of $26,860 each (170 penalty units, 100% of max): failure to comply with the Responsible Gambling Code, and separately breaching its own terms and conditions with a customer.) ·
finalised
Fined twice in the one decision, following a Commission-initiated review that continued after a customer dispute had already been privately settled: for Responsible Gambling Code failures and for a terms-and-conditions breach.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2021-08-18 ·
penalty · $5,338 (20% of the then-maximum 170 penalty units.) ·
finalised
Fine for sending promotional material to the holder of a closed betting account, in breach of the Code of Practice.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2021-05-25 ·
penalty · $8,058 (51 penalty units (30% of max).) ·
finalised
Fine for a licence-condition breach identified in resolving a customer dispute.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2021-03-11 ·
penalty · $45,662 (Two separate fines in one decision, explicitly totalled by the Commission itself: $18,802 (70% of max - failure to identify a self-excluded customer) plus $26,860 (100% of max - sending promotional material to a self-excluded person, a repeat breach).) ·
finalised
Fined twice in the one decision for self-exclusion failures: allowing a self-excluded person to open an account, and separately sending that person promotional material.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2020-06-10 ·
reprimand · amount not stated ·
finalised
Reprimand for breaching the self-exclusion provisions of the Code of Practice - Sportsbet lacked adequate self-exclusion facilities and failed to record a customer's self-exclusion in its Gambling Incident Register.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2020-06-05 ·
penalty · $13,345 (85 penalty units (50% of the then-maximum 170) - covers both a Code breach and a separate unrecorded-call breach dealt with together.) ·
finalised
Fine for a Code of Practice breach and for failing to record a required telephone conversation.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2020-03-10 ·
penalty · $8,007 (30% of the then-maximum 170 penalty units.) ·
finalised
Fine for failing to prevent a self-excluded customer from accessing gambling products across betting platforms (Classic Bet, Best Bet) it had acquired.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2020-01-31 ·
penalty · $6,751 (43 penalty units.) ·
finalised
Fine for failing to identify a self-excluded customer, in breach of the Code of Practice.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2020-01-17 ·
penalty · $18,445 (70% of the then-maximum 170 penalty units - the second such breach by TopBetta.) ·
finalised
Fine for sending promotional material to a self-excluded customer, in breach of the Code of Practice.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2019-11-26 ·
penalty · $6,751 (43 penalty units.) ·
finalised
Fine for failing to identify a self-excluded customer, in breach of the Code of Practice.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2019-11-05 ·
penalty · $26,690 (100% of the then-maximum 170 penalty units. Licensee was then named GVC Australia Pty Ltd, trading as Ladbrokes.) ·
finalised
Fine after Ladbrokes staff distributed pre-loaded 'Cash in Cards' at promotional events and helped attendees open and fund betting accounts on the spot, breaching a licence condition.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2019-08-20 ·
penalty · $25,032 (Two separate fines in one decision: $18,445 (70% of max, second Code breach - self-exclusion/red-flag failures) plus $6,587 (25% of max, first breach of licence condition 20 - failure to record a telephone call).) ·
finalised
Fined twice in the one decision: for failing to identify and act on a self-excluded/at-risk customer, and separately for not recording a required telephone conversation.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2019-03-11 ·
reprimand · amount not stated ·
finalised
Reprimand - first breach of its kind - for failing to record a telephone call relating to a cash-out offer.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2019-02-14 ·
reprimand · amount not stated ·
finalised
Reprimand for failing to record customer telephone conversations as its licence required.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2019-02-11 ·
penalty · $5,270 (20% of the then-maximum 170 penalty units.) ·
finalised
Fine for breaching licence conditions relating to compliance with the Code of Practice.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2017-11-29 ·
reprimand · amount not stated ·
finalised
Reprimand and a directive to always complete a credit check before entering deferred-settlement-facility arrangements, after PointsBet extended one without a credit check.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2017-11-15 ·
penalty · $13,090 (85 penalty units - Sportsbet self-reported the verification failure to the Commission.) ·
finalised
Fine after Sportsbet self-reported that roughly 1,500 customer accounts (including one opened by a minor) had been incorrectly recorded as identity-verified.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
NT Wagering Commission · 2017-08-16 ·
penalty · $13,090 (85 penalty units (50% of the then-maximum 170).) ·
finalised
Commission-initiated (own-motion) fine after a dispute investigation found Betfair had not recorded telephone conversations with a customer as its licence required.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
AUSTRAC · 2017-03-16 ·
civil proceedings · $45,000,000 ·
finalised
Filed Jul 2015; Federal Court judgment 16 Mar 2017. No standalone document for this historical matter was captured in this snapshot - sourced from the AUSTRAC register's own summary text (summarise-and-link).
Federal Court ordered Tab Ltd, Tabcorp Holdings Ltd and Tabcorp Wagering (Vic) Pty Ltd to pay a $45 million penalty in AUSTRAC civil penalty proceedings filed July 2015.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (1)
AUSTRAC · 2015 (year only - see note below) ·
remedial direction · amount not stated ·
finalised
AUSTRAC's register lists this under year 2015; the captured PDF yielded no extractable text (scanned/image document) so the exact day is not confirmed in this capture.
Remedial direction under AML/CTF law.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (2)
AUSTRAC · 2014 (year only - see note below) ·
infringement · amount not stated ·
finalised
AUSTRAC's register lists this under year 2014; the captured PDF yielded no extractable text (scanned/image document) so the exact day is not confirmed in this capture.
Infringement notice under AML/CTF law.
Summarise-and-link only (source is not CC-licensed) - see the source for full text. Verify at source.
Source documents (2)